about

Quantum Leadership (QL) is a fresh and distinctive take on the broader "quantum leadership" concept, particularly in its explicit framing as a leadership lens for the post-AI era.
Existing "quantum leadership" theories date back to the 1990s (e.g., pioneered by Danah Zohar) and have evolved through works like the 2019 book Quantum Leadership by Frederick Chavalit Tsao and Chris Laszlo.
These typically draw metaphors from quantum physics (such as superposition, entanglement, uncertainty, interconnectedness, and emergence) to describe leadership in complex, chaotic, or VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous) environments. They emphasize shifting from hierarchical, mechanistic (Newtonian) models to adaptive, relational, and holistic ones, often incorporating neuroscience, consciousness, or complexity science.
What sets the contemporary version of QL presented here uniquely apart:
It positions QL explicitly as the first leadership thesis designed for the post-AI era, focusing on how intelligence flows through human + machine systems.
It treats leadership as a systemic act rather than an individual trait or role, prioritizing collective intelligence (at the individual or group level) amid rapid AI evolution, abundant signals, and limited certainty.
Unlike most quantum leadership literature, which is AI-agnostic or predates widespread generative AI, this model integrates AI as a core disruptor, evolving leadership toward observing and enhancing systemic flows (e.g., addressing AI's "black box" and uncertainty).
Introduces a quantifiable model for Quantum Leadership through the Network (or Node) Quotient (NQ) — also called the System Quotient — a unitary scorecard that can be used to assess the capacity and throughput of human, AI, and human+AI systems via factors like intelligence capacity, alignment, latency, and AI leverage. This shifts QL from metaphorical philosophy to an engineerable, auditable asset.
No direct predecessors frame quantum leadership this way in a post-AI context.
This perspective builds on quantum metaphors but applies them uniquely to AI-driven changes, making it an evolutionary adaptation rather than a complete reinvention.
I believe it's an important contribution, as AI is reshaping work and decision-making faster than traditional assessments can adapt.

So… what's next?
Experiments
Expand on QL and self-guided NQ assessments and tools...
Real-time Assessment
How might an AI-supported assessment provide value to individuals?
Platform & Access
How might assessments, training, tools, and community look like for QL?
A monthly 'Q' note…
Join the leaders and quietly intense thinkers who read my notes about quantum leadership… perspective that might shift perception, practical experiments, and an occasional personal reflection.
Join 1,327,000+ inspired readers of the Q newsletter.
ok, it's more like 100+ but whatever….